Posts Tagged 'Classis'

Featured Recording: “Classical” Music

Featured Recording

Perhaps it’s just because I’ve never served as a delegate, but there are few church-related events I enjoy more than classis meetings.  There is something of a foretaste of heaven fellowshipping with godly men from across the eastern seaboard, watching them work through difficult issues with grace and wisdom, and witnessing their unified decisions to work for the advancement of Christ’s kingdom.  Veteran readers of this blog may remember that I wrote about last year’s spring classis meeting way back here.

Carbondale URCThe classis to which my church belongs, Classis Eastern US of the United Reformed Churches in North America, most recently met at Covenant URC in Carbondale, PA, last Friday.  It included the most grueling trip of the five classis meetings I’ve attended thus far (we departed Long Island at 3:45 am and didn’t arrive back home until 10:15 pm), but it was also one of the most uplifting.  And, since four years of college will most likely prevent visits to future meetings for a while, I made sure to enjoy this one to the utmost.

For those unfamiliar with Reformed church government, the classis consists of two delegates (usually a pastor and an elder) from each of the eleven congregations along the East Coast.  These men gather to make decisions for the collective benefit of the churches—not to contradict or supersede the authority of the individual consistories, but to put our ecclesiastical unity into practice by seeking common goals.

Carbondale Stained Glass IIWCarbondale Stained Glass Ihile I could write an entire blog series outlining and evaluating the discussions and decisions that occurred in Carbondale last Friday, I’ll attempt to be brief.  It seems hardly an exaggeration to say that Classis Eastern US is exploding—in a wondrous way.  Our one currently active church plant, Christ Reformed Church in Washington, DC, is in the process of organizing into a fully functioning church.  Under the leadership of Mr. Sam Perez, who will be ordained DV at the end of this month, Messiah’s Reformed Fellowship in NYC will soon begin a church plant just across the Hudson River in Jersey City, New Jersey.  Seminarian Zac Wyse is making similar efforts to start a URCNA plant on the west side of Cincinnati, Ohio.  Three churches or core groups in Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Georgia are currently looking to join our classis.  And just this week I received word that another URCNA-focused core group is forming in Danbury, Connecticut!

Along with church planting, pursuing ecumenical unity with other Reformed denominations is a vital aspect of the health of our classis.  This particular meeting included fraternal visitors from the Presbyterian Church in America, the Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church, the Orthodox Presbyterian Church, the Reformed Presbyterian Church in North America, and the Canadian Reformed Churches.  Psalm-singing was featured prominently, and I think profitably, in discussions with the representatives from the RPCNA and the CanRC.  In addition, Mr. Joel Pearce, the Eastern representative of the URCNA Psalter Hymnal Committee, presented an informative update on their project.

Carbondale SanctuaryFor all the prospective church plants in our area, Classis Eastern US needs ministers—and the Lord seems to be providing those as well.  One current student at Mid-America Reformed Seminary was in attendance at the meeting; the delegates also approved the disbursement of classical funds to help pay for the tuition costs of two other prospective seminarians.  The growth of our little federation on the east coast is so great that, as one pastor has expressed it, “The ripe fruit is so abundant that it is falling out of the tree for want of enough hands to gather it up.”  All glory be to God!

One of the elements of classis that I find most encouraging is the heartfelt prayers of the delegates—at the beginning and end of the meeting, and after just about any major decision.  At this particular meeting, however, some of the most moving prayers came by way of song.  That, in fact, brings us to today’s Featured Recording.

Carbondale OrganCovenant URC in Carbondale worships in the quaintly cozy building of an old Lutheran church on Church Street in the downtown.  I’ve interspersed pictures of the sanctuary throughout this article.  The pride and joy of the building is its ancient pipe organ, which I had the privilege of playing that day.  Thankfully I had thought to bring my video camera and was able to record all of the day’s music.  Below the delegates sing the rich missionary hymn “Far and Near the Fields are Teeming,” number 405 from the blue Psalter Hymnal.  Chairman Rev. Aaron Verhoef selected this hymn to accompany his opening devotions; how perfectly it complements the desire and outlook of our churches!

URC Psalmody’s YouTube channel now includes five other recordings from that day.  During a hasty practice session during the lunch hour, I recorded organ improvisations on Psalter Hymnal numbers 55 (“How Blest is He Whose Trespass”), 165 (“Our Gracious God Has Laid His Firm Foundations”), and 172 (“My Mouth Shall Sing for Aye Thy Tender Mercies, Lord”).  After hearing Rev. William den Hollander’s address on behalf of the Canadian Reformed Churches, the delegates sang #287 (“With All My Heart Will I Record”), a setting of Psalm 138 in the Genevan style.  And this group of weary but joyful men closed their day with the singing of #490 (“Praise Ye the Lord, Ye Hosts Above”).

Organ Stops

As I reflect on this assembly, I find myself filled with gratitude to God for his faithfulness through all ages, and I am reminded of the confident words of the Heidelberg Catechism in Lord’s Day 21, Question & Answer 54:

I believe that the Son of God,
through his Spirit and Word,
out of the entire human race,
from the beginning of the world to its end,
gathers, protects, and preserves for himself
a community chosen for eternal life
and united in true faith.
And of this community I am and always will be
a living member.

–MRK

(Click here for last week’s Featured Recording)

Organ Pedals

“Thank You for Your Patience”

Preakness Valley URC

Preakness Valley URC

Loyal readers of URC Psalmody may notice that the blog has been sitting on the proverbial back burner for a little while, at least as far as my contributions are concerned.  That’s certainly not because my life has lately become quiet and unexciting!  Rather, it’s mostly due to a nine-day road trip that took my family from the fall 2012 meeting of Classis Eastern United States to the suburbs of Chicago and back again.  Along the way we had the chance to visit the Preakness Valley United Reformed Church in Wayne, NJ, and worship with the saints at Community United Reformed Church in Schererville, IN.

There are plenty of things to fascinate the Reformed mind in the area around Schererville.  There are lots of United Reformed congregations in the area.  There’s Mid-America Reformed Seminary in nearby Dyer.  And there’s Jim Oord.

Over the weekend Jim arranged for the two of us to accompany the morning worship service at Community URC on organ and piano—a fantastic experience since both instruments were top-notch.  We enjoyed creating arrangements of Psalter Hymnal numbers 48, 49, 160, and 287 on the fly for service music, and accompanying the congregation in singing well-chosen psalms and hymns was incredibly uplifting.

Practicing at Community URC

Practicing at Community URC

Even more incredibly, Jim invited me to give a presentation during Community’s adult Sunday school session on “Psalms for a New Generation.”  This was the first of its kind, and I was truly apprehensive.  By God’s grace, however, I managed to present the material without losing my sanity, and from the feedback I got it seems to have been well-received.  Recordings of the class should be available online in the near future, via YouTube or even SermonAudio.com.

On Tuesday I sat in on a few classes at Mid-America, enjoyed lunch with one of the faculty members, and got to catch up with some friends from synod and RYS.  Jim joined me there in the afternoon, where we recorded a special video version of our ongoing discussion series on Sing a New Song.  Awaiting editing, that presentation should also be up within a week or so.

Along the way, we had the chance to share our passion for the psalms with a wide variety of people.  I was immensely encouraged just by the instruction and encouragement I received during this trip, and by the unique fellowship that only Christians can share.  The journey had its setbacks, but it was nevertheless a time of much-needed growth.

All of this to say: I hope you’ll bear with me as I get back into the flow of things here on URC Psalmody.  Expect some more posts and our “regular features” to pop up over the course of the next few days.  I am excited to see how God will continue to use this humble little blog to bring glory to his Name.

But for now, I will continue to be haunted by the realization that the newest speaker on SermonAudio might be someone who’s not even old enough to vote.

–MRK

Overture Overview: #9 on Publishing Songbook

After a series of overtures spanning multiple pages, it’s a relief to see that Overture #9 occupies only one page.  Nevertheless, this overture is no less weighty than its companions.

Summary: Classis Western Canada overtures Synod 2012 to instruct the Psalter Hymnal Committee (1) “to proceed towards the publication of a songbook…without further delay,” (2) “to develop a songbook that has as its basis the 1976 edition of the CRC blue Psalter Hymnal” with a “limited number of new and generally accepted” psalms and hymns, (3) “to include all synodically-approved liturgical forms in the songbook,” (4) “to minimize changes as much as possible in the new songbook,” and (5) to imitate “the transition process undertaken by the CRC when the blue Psalter Hymnal was produced.”

Grounds: This overture doesn’t include any comments or examples besides the above requests.  The grounds provided by Classis Western Canada are brief enough that I’ll include them here in their entirety.

  1. “This is in keeping with the expressed desires of previous synods that a URCNA songbook be created.
  2. “This alleviates unrest in the churches concerning various proposals, publications and comments concerning the present, partially proposed songbook which has created controversy in the churches.
  3. “This clarifies an underlying understanding that the blue Psalter Hymnal is not being jettisoned.
  4. “This allows for possible further contact with the OPC should synod so request and approve of such, without the URCNA having to wait for an updated songbook.
  5. “This allows the Psalter Hymnal Committee to continue to work with the OPC, should synod so request and approve of such, taking all the time necessary to further refine and meet the needs of the churches.”

My comments: The first two grounds seem reasonable enough.  I’m unsure of the meaning of the third; whose underlying understanding is it that the blue Psalter Hymnal is not being jettisoned?  Perhaps some affirmation to this extent was given at Synod 2010, of which I’m simply not aware.  Grounds 4 and 5 don’t seem relevant to the overture, and the fifth ground (“taking all the time necessary”) doesn’t seem to mesh well with the first request (“proceed towards the publication…without further delay”).  But my reaction might simply be a result of the fact that I don’t understand Overture #9 as well as I would like to.

Questions for discussion: What necessitates a quicker push towards publication of a new songbook?  Would the debates over the URC’s psalms and hymns be better resolved if we began using the URC Psalter Hymnal sooner, or held off on publication for several more years?  What if the compilation of the OPC is already vastly different than the blue Psalter Hymnal—should the URC proceed to work with them, or insist on a blue-based songbook?  Your responses are most welcome.

See p. 91 of the Provisional Agenda for the entirety of this overture.

–MRK

Overture Overview: #8 on Modifying Songbook

Following is my synopsis of the content of Classis Western Canada’s overture entitled “Modify Songbook” in the provisional agenda for Synod 2012.

Summary: “Classis Western Canada overtures Synod 2012 to direct the Songbook Committee to significantly modify and restrict its approach to the implementation of a new songbook and consider ways by which there may be the least amount of unrest and concern preceding and subsequent to the implementation of a new songbook.”

Key ideas: Classis Western Canada divides their concerns into six primary matters, which I’ve compacted below.

  1. Gender neutralization, which occurs in some instances in the Hymn Proposal, “violates the Word of God,” “alters the intent and meaning of the originating author” in hymns, and “is a capitulation to worldly standards and policies.”  Such modifications are “beyond the mandate given by any synod since the committee was first appointed in 1997.”
  2. The Songbook Committee’s argumentation for discontinuing the use of the name Jehovah (see the answer to Question 10 on the Committee’s FAQ page) “is unconvincing.”  The overture notes that none of the common English names for the Deity (including “Lord,” “God,” and “Father”) are found in the original Biblical languages.
  3. “Many word changes in the proposed book appear to be unnecessary or trivial,” without substantial support or Biblical grounds from the Songbook Committee.
  4. The extensive changes to familiar hymns in the Hymn Proposal will disrupt the ability of many older members to sing from memory, “and congregational singing will suffer greatly” from such modifications.
  5. The fact that some Hymn Proposal selections remain unaltered seems to demonstrate “an arbitrariness or inconsistency in the process of changing select songs, possibly on the basis of preference rather than on principle.”
  6. “Some proposed songs have little or no track record, tradition, or established durability in Reformed churches, or the wider church community,” making them unreliable selections for a new Psalter Hymnal.  The overture argues that the use of these newer songs violates the ninth Guideline for Selecting Church Music as approved by synod: “The music of the church should be expressive of the Reformed tradition.  Use is to be made of the music developed in the tradition of this rich heritage.”

Examples: After each main point, Classis Western Canada provides an extensive list of applicable songs in the Hymn Proposal.  They identify 20 gender-neutralized selections, 4 removals of the word “Jehovah,” 21 hymns with “unnecessary or trivial” modifications (noting that this is a “partial list”), 36 instances of drastic changes (again, only a partial list), 11 unchanged hymns, and 11 songs with “a life span of less than 15 years.”

Grounds: Although the grounds in Overture #8 are not directly based on the synodically-approved Principles and Guidelines, the classis provides six primary reasons for their overture, as outlined below:

  1. “The transition to a new songbook is too great and abrupt, and may cause great turmoil in the church.”
  2. The classis requests that the URCNA seek “a smooth and painless transition” to the new Psalter Hymnal, as was implemented during the CRC’s shift from the red Psalter Hymnal to the blue in the 1950s.
  3. The Hymn Proposal “opens up old wounds” for URCNA members who left their former congregations as a result of the introduction of a new hymnbook.
  4. “The present proposal contains far too many changes, adjustments and new material for it to function well in the foreseeable future.”
  5. “The tide of significant objection” to the Hymn Proposal within the URCNA “gives cause for review and reflection.”
  6. “There exists a misunderstanding as to the will of the originating classis whose overture was adopted by Synod 1997.”

1976 Psalter Hymnal

My thoughts: The basis of this overture rests exclusively in the blue Psalter Hymnal, whereas Overtures #4-6 often depart from it entirely.  Can synod form an acceptable compromise that will satisfy the requests presented in all of these overtures, ensuring that the United Reformed Churches in North America will create a Psalter Hymnal which utilizes the best of the blue book without carrying over its flaws?  (On the imperfections of the blue Psalter Hymnal, see my thoughts on the “About This Blog” page.)

Let’s earnestly pray for God’s direction as Synod 2012 endeavors to attain this goal.

See pp. 87-89 of the Provisional Agenda for the entirety of this overture.

–MRK

Overture Overview: #6 on Musical Suggestions

Below is my synopsis of the content of Classis Southwest US’s overture on Musical Suggestions in the provisional agenda for Synod 2012.

Summary: Classis Southwest United States overtures Synod 2012 to refer many suggestions for musical improvement to the Psalter Hymnal Committee.

Key ideas: “The suggestions included in this overture are primarily of a musical nature, with the intent to improve the compositional quality of the hymn tunes in order that the URCNA might publish a songbook that exhibits careful attention to musical detail and displays musical excellence.”

Grounds: Since most of the proposed changes in this report are fairly insignificant, grounds are not provided for each recommendation.  However, at the beginning of the overture, two broad grounds are given: (1) this overture follows the mandate of Synod 2010 in the procedure of suggesting changes for improving the hymnal, and (2) the suggestions contained in the overture are in line with the synodically-approved Principles and Guidelines for Selecting Church Music.

Important elements: The majority of this report is composed of highly specific musical comments (“need double whole note to indicate both SA pitches,” “add extension bars (with possible passing tones) after m. 7 and m. 14,” &c.).  One of the most important sections towards the beginning of the overture deals with musical considerations.  Here, Mrs. Pamela Compton expertly addresses the sticky issues of vocal range and key—often overlooked in new hymn collections, but particularly important to us as musicians.  The overture also includes a list of suggested additions and removals, but it’s hard to see why this list is necessary, given the fact that both Overtures #4 and #5 deal with the very same topic (and, in many cases, the very same hymns).  The overture concludes with a letter from another URCNA musician on the importance of choosing tune keys wisely.

My thoughts: I’m blown away by the scope and depth of Mrs. Compton’s fantastic report.  She is an extremely encouraging example of a URCNA member who realizes the significance of the church’s music.  But I must ask: Why has Synod 2012 been given the immense task of sorting through this lengthy overture and approving or rejecting it?  It’s my understanding that suggestions for improvement were intended to go through the classes directly to the Songbook Committee (see 2010 Acts of Synod, pp. 21-23).  Should synod, a primarily non-musical body, be given the charge of interpreting this highly musical set of comments and corrections?  What benefit is obtained by this apparently extraneous step?  I don’t aim to question the decisions of Classis Southwest US; I’m just honestly puzzled.

See pp. 57-83 of the Provisional Agenda for the entirety of this overture.

–MRK


Welcome to URC Psalmody

We hope you'll join us as we discuss music, worship, the psalms, the church, and much more here on URC Psalmody. You can learn about the purpose of this blog here. We look forward to to seeing you in the discussions!

With this feature, just enter your email address and you'll receive notifications of new posts on URC Psalmody by email!

Join 209 other followers

Categories